Mokoro Ltd

Aid Effectiveness

International development donors still have to make a serious effort to improve the amount and the effectiveness of their aid if they are to deliver on their promises.

The preliminary ODA figures show that in 2007, there was only a small rise in aid - 2.4 per cent - excluding the expected major fall in debt relief. Half way into the six years covered by the Gleneagles commitment on ODA (2004-2010), total aid has risen by 15 per cent. But to meet the 2010 Gleneagles targets for aid - to get from $80 billion in 2004, to $130 billion in 2010 - the rate of increase needs to more than double.

Angel Gurría, OECD Secretary-General. Tokyo, 5 April 2008

We live in a world where more than one billion people are living in extreme poverty. In Sub-Saharan Africa, where GDP per capita shrank by 14 percent, poverty rose from 41 percent in 1981 to 46 percent in 2001, resulting in an additional 150 million people living in extreme poverty (World Bank data). In April 2008 the World Bank warned that the surge in food prices could push 100 million people into deeper poverty.

The realisation that millions of people were not being helped out of poverty in spite of decades of aid has led to calls for "a quantum leap in scale and ambition" of development aid (United Nations, 2004). The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) set out the aims of this scaled-up approach. With revised assessments of aid effectiveness during the 1990s, the international development community recognizes that more aid is not enough; more effective aid is needed.

In 2005 over 100 donors and partner countries endorsed the Paris Declaration and committed to improving ownership, alignment, harmonisation, managing for results and mutual accountability. At the Accra High Level Forum in September 2008 the international community plans to take stock of how well they have done on the Paris Declaration commitments and what remains to be done.

Back To Top

Mokoro experience

Mokoro has been involved in aid management issues for many years. Our approach to aid management has always emphasised the basic responsibility of the recipient government for aid coordination and the need to see aid as one aspect, and preferably not the dominant aspect, of overall resource management. Recent work has focused on the interlocking commitments by donors and partner countries to move energetically towards the greater use of country systems in the delivery of aid.

Mokoro consultants have considerable experience and expertise in the area of aid effectiveness, including the implementation of the Paris Declaration. Mokoro has worked on aid effectiveness at the policy level (e.g. revision of EC sector-wide approach guidance, DAC good practice on sector programming), on the implementation of Paris Declaration commitments at country level (e.g. Lesotho aid effectiveness study) and on evaluations of aid effectiveness (e.g. evaluations of Danida country programmes to Mozambique and Uganda; reviews of Irish Aid development assistance modalities in Ethiopia, Uganda, Palestine and Lesotho; the OECD DAC multi-country Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support). Mokoro provided support to the Rome and Paris High Level Forums (through involvement in harmonisation and alignment work leading to the Rome Declaration and the OECD Volume II as background for the Paris Declaration). Mokoro is currently finalising an important study (the SPA/CABRI Putting Aid On Budget Study) to better equip governments to lead processes for bringing aid on budget.

We have worked with a wide array of clients in this area, including: Danida, DFID, the EC, Irish Aid, the Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway, Sida, World Bank.

Back To Top

Mokoro's recent work

Mozambique: Evaluation of Danish Aid Programme (2007-08)
Comprehensive evaluation of development cooperation between Mozambique and Denmark 1992-2006. Conducted in collaboration with ECORYS.  Final reports now available - see project website: http://www.mokoro.co.uk/dme.html. Client: Danida

Stocktake of Donor Approaches to Managing Risks and Benefits when using Country Systems (2007-08)
Team: Rebecca Carter, Stephen Lister (Mokoro) with Jeremy Cant and Caroline Rickatson (CIPFA).
Mokoro collaborated with the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) to produce a stocktake paper which identifies and analyses donor approaches to managing risks when using country systems, the range of benefits from using country systems recognized by donors and the different types of relationships between risks and benefits recognized by donors. The stocktake was commissioned by DFID to feed into the OECD DAC Joint Venture on Public Financial Management’s report for the Accra High Level Forum. The Stocktake Report is available here

Client: DFID

10 Country Study in Sub Saharan Africa: Putting Aid On Budget (2007-2008)
Mokoro completed an important study (Putting Aid On Budget Study, for SPA/|CABRI) which has developed good practice guidelines for using country budget systems. See project website: http://www.mokoro.co.uk/aob.htm. Client: DFID for Collaborative Africa Budget Reform Initiative (CABRI) and Strategic Partnership with Africa (SPA).

Joint Evaluation of General Budget Support 1994-2004 (2004-2006)
The largest evaluation ever sponsored by the OECD DAC, this study was commissioned jointly by a large group of bilateral and multilateral donors, together with partner countries, in order to evaluate to what extent, and under what circumstances (in what country contexts), General Budget Support is relevant, efficient and effective for achieving sustainable impacts on poverty reduction and growth. It involved seven country studies (Burkina Faso, Malawi, Mozambique, Nicaragua, Rwanda, Uganda and Vietnam). The evaluation drew on and refined a pioneering evaluation framework that had been developed and tested for DFID and the DAC evaluation network. The evaluation reports are available for download here. Mokoro was part of the consortium led by IDD at the University of Birmingham undertaking the evaluation and provided the evaluation Team Leader and other members of the evaluation team including Team Leaders for the Vietnam, Rwanda and Uganda country studies, team members for Vietnam, Rwanda, Burkina Faso and Mozambique, cross-cutting specialists for environment and democracy & human rights, and a member of the Quality Assurance Panel. Client: DFID for donor group.

For the longer list of Mokoro assignments see Projects page.

Back To Top